<code id='1ADDCC72A9'></code><style id='1ADDCC72A9'></style>
    • <acronym id='1ADDCC72A9'></acronym>
      <center id='1ADDCC72A9'><center id='1ADDCC72A9'><tfoot id='1ADDCC72A9'></tfoot></center><abbr id='1ADDCC72A9'><dir id='1ADDCC72A9'><tfoot id='1ADDCC72A9'></tfoot><noframes id='1ADDCC72A9'>

    • <optgroup id='1ADDCC72A9'><strike id='1ADDCC72A9'><sup id='1ADDCC72A9'></sup></strike><code id='1ADDCC72A9'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='1ADDCC72A9'><label id='1ADDCC72A9'><select id='1ADDCC72A9'><dt id='1ADDCC72A9'><span id='1ADDCC72A9'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='1ADDCC72A9'></u>
          <i id='1ADDCC72A9'><strike id='1ADDCC72A9'><tt id='1ADDCC72A9'><pre id='1ADDCC72A9'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / explore

          explore


          explore

          author:hotspot    Page View:6784
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In