<code id='F8C38350DE'></code><style id='F8C38350DE'></style>
    • <acronym id='F8C38350DE'></acronym>
      <center id='F8C38350DE'><center id='F8C38350DE'><tfoot id='F8C38350DE'></tfoot></center><abbr id='F8C38350DE'><dir id='F8C38350DE'><tfoot id='F8C38350DE'></tfoot><noframes id='F8C38350DE'>

    • <optgroup id='F8C38350DE'><strike id='F8C38350DE'><sup id='F8C38350DE'></sup></strike><code id='F8C38350DE'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='F8C38350DE'><label id='F8C38350DE'><select id='F8C38350DE'><dt id='F8C38350DE'><span id='F8C38350DE'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='F8C38350DE'></u>
          <i id='F8C38350DE'><strike id='F8C38350DE'><tt id='F8C38350DE'><pre id='F8C38350DE'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:hotspot    Page View:86
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In