<code id='0027B49059'></code><style id='0027B49059'></style>
    • <acronym id='0027B49059'></acronym>
      <center id='0027B49059'><center id='0027B49059'><tfoot id='0027B49059'></tfoot></center><abbr id='0027B49059'><dir id='0027B49059'><tfoot id='0027B49059'></tfoot><noframes id='0027B49059'>

    • <optgroup id='0027B49059'><strike id='0027B49059'><sup id='0027B49059'></sup></strike><code id='0027B49059'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='0027B49059'><label id='0027B49059'><select id='0027B49059'><dt id='0027B49059'><span id='0027B49059'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='0027B49059'></u>
          <i id='0027B49059'><strike id='0027B49059'><tt id='0027B49059'><pre id='0027B49059'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / knowledge / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:focus    Page View:9319
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In