<code id='39BEA8CE48'></code><style id='39BEA8CE48'></style>
    • <acronym id='39BEA8CE48'></acronym>
      <center id='39BEA8CE48'><center id='39BEA8CE48'><tfoot id='39BEA8CE48'></tfoot></center><abbr id='39BEA8CE48'><dir id='39BEA8CE48'><tfoot id='39BEA8CE48'></tfoot><noframes id='39BEA8CE48'>

    • <optgroup id='39BEA8CE48'><strike id='39BEA8CE48'><sup id='39BEA8CE48'></sup></strike><code id='39BEA8CE48'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='39BEA8CE48'><label id='39BEA8CE48'><select id='39BEA8CE48'><dt id='39BEA8CE48'><span id='39BEA8CE48'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='39BEA8CE48'></u>
          <i id='39BEA8CE48'><strike id='39BEA8CE48'><tt id='39BEA8CE48'><pre id='39BEA8CE48'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / fashion / explore

          explore


          explore

          author:knowledge    Page View:524
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In