<code id='F2A869357F'></code><style id='F2A869357F'></style>
    • <acronym id='F2A869357F'></acronym>
      <center id='F2A869357F'><center id='F2A869357F'><tfoot id='F2A869357F'></tfoot></center><abbr id='F2A869357F'><dir id='F2A869357F'><tfoot id='F2A869357F'></tfoot><noframes id='F2A869357F'>

    • <optgroup id='F2A869357F'><strike id='F2A869357F'><sup id='F2A869357F'></sup></strike><code id='F2A869357F'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='F2A869357F'><label id='F2A869357F'><select id='F2A869357F'><dt id='F2A869357F'><span id='F2A869357F'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='F2A869357F'></u>
          <i id='F2A869357F'><strike id='F2A869357F'><tt id='F2A869357F'><pre id='F2A869357F'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:fashion    Page View:8664
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In