<code id='5C1666AE71'></code><style id='5C1666AE71'></style>
    • <acronym id='5C1666AE71'></acronym>
      <center id='5C1666AE71'><center id='5C1666AE71'><tfoot id='5C1666AE71'></tfoot></center><abbr id='5C1666AE71'><dir id='5C1666AE71'><tfoot id='5C1666AE71'></tfoot><noframes id='5C1666AE71'>

    • <optgroup id='5C1666AE71'><strike id='5C1666AE71'><sup id='5C1666AE71'></sup></strike><code id='5C1666AE71'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='5C1666AE71'><label id='5C1666AE71'><select id='5C1666AE71'><dt id='5C1666AE71'><span id='5C1666AE71'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='5C1666AE71'></u>
          <i id='5C1666AE71'><strike id='5C1666AE71'><tt id='5C1666AE71'><pre id='5C1666AE71'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / fashion / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:entertainment    Page View:6922
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In