<code id='FA441D007E'></code><style id='FA441D007E'></style>
    • <acronym id='FA441D007E'></acronym>
      <center id='FA441D007E'><center id='FA441D007E'><tfoot id='FA441D007E'></tfoot></center><abbr id='FA441D007E'><dir id='FA441D007E'><tfoot id='FA441D007E'></tfoot><noframes id='FA441D007E'>

    • <optgroup id='FA441D007E'><strike id='FA441D007E'><sup id='FA441D007E'></sup></strike><code id='FA441D007E'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='FA441D007E'><label id='FA441D007E'><select id='FA441D007E'><dt id='FA441D007E'><span id='FA441D007E'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='FA441D007E'></u>
          <i id='FA441D007E'><strike id='FA441D007E'><tt id='FA441D007E'><pre id='FA441D007E'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:1
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In