<code id='AA202CE4D4'></code><style id='AA202CE4D4'></style>
    • <acronym id='AA202CE4D4'></acronym>
      <center id='AA202CE4D4'><center id='AA202CE4D4'><tfoot id='AA202CE4D4'></tfoot></center><abbr id='AA202CE4D4'><dir id='AA202CE4D4'><tfoot id='AA202CE4D4'></tfoot><noframes id='AA202CE4D4'>

    • <optgroup id='AA202CE4D4'><strike id='AA202CE4D4'><sup id='AA202CE4D4'></sup></strike><code id='AA202CE4D4'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='AA202CE4D4'><label id='AA202CE4D4'><select id='AA202CE4D4'><dt id='AA202CE4D4'><span id='AA202CE4D4'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='AA202CE4D4'></u>
          <i id='AA202CE4D4'><strike id='AA202CE4D4'><tt id='AA202CE4D4'><pre id='AA202CE4D4'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / explore / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:explore    Page View:6942
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In