<code id='DC15BC9AEF'></code><style id='DC15BC9AEF'></style>
    • <acronym id='DC15BC9AEF'></acronym>
      <center id='DC15BC9AEF'><center id='DC15BC9AEF'><tfoot id='DC15BC9AEF'></tfoot></center><abbr id='DC15BC9AEF'><dir id='DC15BC9AEF'><tfoot id='DC15BC9AEF'></tfoot><noframes id='DC15BC9AEF'>

    • <optgroup id='DC15BC9AEF'><strike id='DC15BC9AEF'><sup id='DC15BC9AEF'></sup></strike><code id='DC15BC9AEF'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='DC15BC9AEF'><label id='DC15BC9AEF'><select id='DC15BC9AEF'><dt id='DC15BC9AEF'><span id='DC15BC9AEF'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='DC15BC9AEF'></u>
          <i id='DC15BC9AEF'><strike id='DC15BC9AEF'><tt id='DC15BC9AEF'><pre id='DC15BC9AEF'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:focus    Page View:85
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In