<code id='259FD8537D'></code><style id='259FD8537D'></style>
    • <acronym id='259FD8537D'></acronym>
      <center id='259FD8537D'><center id='259FD8537D'><tfoot id='259FD8537D'></tfoot></center><abbr id='259FD8537D'><dir id='259FD8537D'><tfoot id='259FD8537D'></tfoot><noframes id='259FD8537D'>

    • <optgroup id='259FD8537D'><strike id='259FD8537D'><sup id='259FD8537D'></sup></strike><code id='259FD8537D'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='259FD8537D'><label id='259FD8537D'><select id='259FD8537D'><dt id='259FD8537D'><span id='259FD8537D'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='259FD8537D'></u>
          <i id='259FD8537D'><strike id='259FD8537D'><tt id='259FD8537D'><pre id='259FD8537D'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / explore / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:knowledge    Page View:12383
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In