<code id='09EF7F0441'></code><style id='09EF7F0441'></style>
    • <acronym id='09EF7F0441'></acronym>
      <center id='09EF7F0441'><center id='09EF7F0441'><tfoot id='09EF7F0441'></tfoot></center><abbr id='09EF7F0441'><dir id='09EF7F0441'><tfoot id='09EF7F0441'></tfoot><noframes id='09EF7F0441'>

    • <optgroup id='09EF7F0441'><strike id='09EF7F0441'><sup id='09EF7F0441'></sup></strike><code id='09EF7F0441'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='09EF7F0441'><label id='09EF7F0441'><select id='09EF7F0441'><dt id='09EF7F0441'><span id='09EF7F0441'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='09EF7F0441'></u>
          <i id='09EF7F0441'><strike id='09EF7F0441'><tt id='09EF7F0441'><pre id='09EF7F0441'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:knowledge    Page View:8
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In