<code id='03EBC9C243'></code><style id='03EBC9C243'></style>
    • <acronym id='03EBC9C243'></acronym>
      <center id='03EBC9C243'><center id='03EBC9C243'><tfoot id='03EBC9C243'></tfoot></center><abbr id='03EBC9C243'><dir id='03EBC9C243'><tfoot id='03EBC9C243'></tfoot><noframes id='03EBC9C243'>

    • <optgroup id='03EBC9C243'><strike id='03EBC9C243'><sup id='03EBC9C243'></sup></strike><code id='03EBC9C243'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='03EBC9C243'><label id='03EBC9C243'><select id='03EBC9C243'><dt id='03EBC9C243'><span id='03EBC9C243'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='03EBC9C243'></u>
          <i id='03EBC9C243'><strike id='03EBC9C243'><tt id='03EBC9C243'><pre id='03EBC9C243'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:entertainment    Page View:627
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In