<code id='13E388EFF0'></code><style id='13E388EFF0'></style>
    • <acronym id='13E388EFF0'></acronym>
      <center id='13E388EFF0'><center id='13E388EFF0'><tfoot id='13E388EFF0'></tfoot></center><abbr id='13E388EFF0'><dir id='13E388EFF0'><tfoot id='13E388EFF0'></tfoot><noframes id='13E388EFF0'>

    • <optgroup id='13E388EFF0'><strike id='13E388EFF0'><sup id='13E388EFF0'></sup></strike><code id='13E388EFF0'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='13E388EFF0'><label id='13E388EFF0'><select id='13E388EFF0'><dt id='13E388EFF0'><span id='13E388EFF0'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='13E388EFF0'></u>
          <i id='13E388EFF0'><strike id='13E388EFF0'><tt id='13E388EFF0'><pre id='13E388EFF0'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / Wikipedia / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:explore    Page View:2
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In