<code id='9F4621A180'></code><style id='9F4621A180'></style>
    • <acronym id='9F4621A180'></acronym>
      <center id='9F4621A180'><center id='9F4621A180'><tfoot id='9F4621A180'></tfoot></center><abbr id='9F4621A180'><dir id='9F4621A180'><tfoot id='9F4621A180'></tfoot><noframes id='9F4621A180'>

    • <optgroup id='9F4621A180'><strike id='9F4621A180'><sup id='9F4621A180'></sup></strike><code id='9F4621A180'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='9F4621A180'><label id='9F4621A180'><select id='9F4621A180'><dt id='9F4621A180'><span id='9F4621A180'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='9F4621A180'></u>
          <i id='9F4621A180'><strike id='9F4621A180'><tt id='9F4621A180'><pre id='9F4621A180'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:28
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In