<code id='C34D42EC31'></code><style id='C34D42EC31'></style>
    • <acronym id='C34D42EC31'></acronym>
      <center id='C34D42EC31'><center id='C34D42EC31'><tfoot id='C34D42EC31'></tfoot></center><abbr id='C34D42EC31'><dir id='C34D42EC31'><tfoot id='C34D42EC31'></tfoot><noframes id='C34D42EC31'>

    • <optgroup id='C34D42EC31'><strike id='C34D42EC31'><sup id='C34D42EC31'></sup></strike><code id='C34D42EC31'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='C34D42EC31'><label id='C34D42EC31'><select id='C34D42EC31'><dt id='C34D42EC31'><span id='C34D42EC31'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='C34D42EC31'></u>
          <i id='C34D42EC31'><strike id='C34D42EC31'><tt id='C34D42EC31'><pre id='C34D42EC31'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / fashion / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:hotspot    Page View:1
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In