<code id='EA65CA11BE'></code><style id='EA65CA11BE'></style>
    • <acronym id='EA65CA11BE'></acronym>
      <center id='EA65CA11BE'><center id='EA65CA11BE'><tfoot id='EA65CA11BE'></tfoot></center><abbr id='EA65CA11BE'><dir id='EA65CA11BE'><tfoot id='EA65CA11BE'></tfoot><noframes id='EA65CA11BE'>

    • <optgroup id='EA65CA11BE'><strike id='EA65CA11BE'><sup id='EA65CA11BE'></sup></strike><code id='EA65CA11BE'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='EA65CA11BE'><label id='EA65CA11BE'><select id='EA65CA11BE'><dt id='EA65CA11BE'><span id='EA65CA11BE'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='EA65CA11BE'></u>
          <i id='EA65CA11BE'><strike id='EA65CA11BE'><tt id='EA65CA11BE'><pre id='EA65CA11BE'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / Wikipedia / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:knowledge    Page View:5462
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In