<code id='01C7912B9C'></code><style id='01C7912B9C'></style>
    • <acronym id='01C7912B9C'></acronym>
      <center id='01C7912B9C'><center id='01C7912B9C'><tfoot id='01C7912B9C'></tfoot></center><abbr id='01C7912B9C'><dir id='01C7912B9C'><tfoot id='01C7912B9C'></tfoot><noframes id='01C7912B9C'>

    • <optgroup id='01C7912B9C'><strike id='01C7912B9C'><sup id='01C7912B9C'></sup></strike><code id='01C7912B9C'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='01C7912B9C'><label id='01C7912B9C'><select id='01C7912B9C'><dt id='01C7912B9C'><span id='01C7912B9C'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='01C7912B9C'></u>
          <i id='01C7912B9C'><strike id='01C7912B9C'><tt id='01C7912B9C'><pre id='01C7912B9C'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / knowledge / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:comprehensive    Page View:49
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In