<code id='5BF3966A56'></code><style id='5BF3966A56'></style>
    • <acronym id='5BF3966A56'></acronym>
      <center id='5BF3966A56'><center id='5BF3966A56'><tfoot id='5BF3966A56'></tfoot></center><abbr id='5BF3966A56'><dir id='5BF3966A56'><tfoot id='5BF3966A56'></tfoot><noframes id='5BF3966A56'>

    • <optgroup id='5BF3966A56'><strike id='5BF3966A56'><sup id='5BF3966A56'></sup></strike><code id='5BF3966A56'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='5BF3966A56'><label id='5BF3966A56'><select id='5BF3966A56'><dt id='5BF3966A56'><span id='5BF3966A56'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='5BF3966A56'></u>
          <i id='5BF3966A56'><strike id='5BF3966A56'><tt id='5BF3966A56'><pre id='5BF3966A56'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:explore    Page View:89
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In