<code id='98E0476A82'></code><style id='98E0476A82'></style>
    • <acronym id='98E0476A82'></acronym>
      <center id='98E0476A82'><center id='98E0476A82'><tfoot id='98E0476A82'></tfoot></center><abbr id='98E0476A82'><dir id='98E0476A82'><tfoot id='98E0476A82'></tfoot><noframes id='98E0476A82'>

    • <optgroup id='98E0476A82'><strike id='98E0476A82'><sup id='98E0476A82'></sup></strike><code id='98E0476A82'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='98E0476A82'><label id='98E0476A82'><select id='98E0476A82'><dt id='98E0476A82'><span id='98E0476A82'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='98E0476A82'></u>
          <i id='98E0476A82'><strike id='98E0476A82'><tt id='98E0476A82'><pre id='98E0476A82'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / knowledge / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:focus    Page View:6773
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In