<code id='ED9F7A3FA6'></code><style id='ED9F7A3FA6'></style>
    • <acronym id='ED9F7A3FA6'></acronym>
      <center id='ED9F7A3FA6'><center id='ED9F7A3FA6'><tfoot id='ED9F7A3FA6'></tfoot></center><abbr id='ED9F7A3FA6'><dir id='ED9F7A3FA6'><tfoot id='ED9F7A3FA6'></tfoot><noframes id='ED9F7A3FA6'>

    • <optgroup id='ED9F7A3FA6'><strike id='ED9F7A3FA6'><sup id='ED9F7A3FA6'></sup></strike><code id='ED9F7A3FA6'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='ED9F7A3FA6'><label id='ED9F7A3FA6'><select id='ED9F7A3FA6'><dt id='ED9F7A3FA6'><span id='ED9F7A3FA6'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='ED9F7A3FA6'></u>
          <i id='ED9F7A3FA6'><strike id='ED9F7A3FA6'><tt id='ED9F7A3FA6'><pre id='ED9F7A3FA6'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / explore

          explore


          explore

          author:knowledge    Page View:32888
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In