<code id='7DED38EFCD'></code><style id='7DED38EFCD'></style>
    • <acronym id='7DED38EFCD'></acronym>
      <center id='7DED38EFCD'><center id='7DED38EFCD'><tfoot id='7DED38EFCD'></tfoot></center><abbr id='7DED38EFCD'><dir id='7DED38EFCD'><tfoot id='7DED38EFCD'></tfoot><noframes id='7DED38EFCD'>

    • <optgroup id='7DED38EFCD'><strike id='7DED38EFCD'><sup id='7DED38EFCD'></sup></strike><code id='7DED38EFCD'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='7DED38EFCD'><label id='7DED38EFCD'><select id='7DED38EFCD'><dt id='7DED38EFCD'><span id='7DED38EFCD'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='7DED38EFCD'></u>
          <i id='7DED38EFCD'><strike id='7DED38EFCD'><tt id='7DED38EFCD'><pre id='7DED38EFCD'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / explore / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:21248
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In