<code id='68E2C9A886'></code><style id='68E2C9A886'></style>
    • <acronym id='68E2C9A886'></acronym>
      <center id='68E2C9A886'><center id='68E2C9A886'><tfoot id='68E2C9A886'></tfoot></center><abbr id='68E2C9A886'><dir id='68E2C9A886'><tfoot id='68E2C9A886'></tfoot><noframes id='68E2C9A886'>

    • <optgroup id='68E2C9A886'><strike id='68E2C9A886'><sup id='68E2C9A886'></sup></strike><code id='68E2C9A886'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='68E2C9A886'><label id='68E2C9A886'><select id='68E2C9A886'><dt id='68E2C9A886'><span id='68E2C9A886'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='68E2C9A886'></u>
          <i id='68E2C9A886'><strike id='68E2C9A886'><tt id='68E2C9A886'><pre id='68E2C9A886'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:comprehensive    Page View:94
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In