<code id='360280C291'></code><style id='360280C291'></style>
    • <acronym id='360280C291'></acronym>
      <center id='360280C291'><center id='360280C291'><tfoot id='360280C291'></tfoot></center><abbr id='360280C291'><dir id='360280C291'><tfoot id='360280C291'></tfoot><noframes id='360280C291'>

    • <optgroup id='360280C291'><strike id='360280C291'><sup id='360280C291'></sup></strike><code id='360280C291'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='360280C291'><label id='360280C291'><select id='360280C291'><dt id='360280C291'><span id='360280C291'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='360280C291'></u>
          <i id='360280C291'><strike id='360280C291'><tt id='360280C291'><pre id='360280C291'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:comprehensive    Page View:1
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In