<code id='735F7E9416'></code><style id='735F7E9416'></style>
    • <acronym id='735F7E9416'></acronym>
      <center id='735F7E9416'><center id='735F7E9416'><tfoot id='735F7E9416'></tfoot></center><abbr id='735F7E9416'><dir id='735F7E9416'><tfoot id='735F7E9416'></tfoot><noframes id='735F7E9416'>

    • <optgroup id='735F7E9416'><strike id='735F7E9416'><sup id='735F7E9416'></sup></strike><code id='735F7E9416'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='735F7E9416'><label id='735F7E9416'><select id='735F7E9416'><dt id='735F7E9416'><span id='735F7E9416'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='735F7E9416'></u>
          <i id='735F7E9416'><strike id='735F7E9416'><tt id='735F7E9416'><pre id='735F7E9416'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / knowledge / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:explore    Page View:51762
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In