<code id='39EA73FFC1'></code><style id='39EA73FFC1'></style>
    • <acronym id='39EA73FFC1'></acronym>
      <center id='39EA73FFC1'><center id='39EA73FFC1'><tfoot id='39EA73FFC1'></tfoot></center><abbr id='39EA73FFC1'><dir id='39EA73FFC1'><tfoot id='39EA73FFC1'></tfoot><noframes id='39EA73FFC1'>

    • <optgroup id='39EA73FFC1'><strike id='39EA73FFC1'><sup id='39EA73FFC1'></sup></strike><code id='39EA73FFC1'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='39EA73FFC1'><label id='39EA73FFC1'><select id='39EA73FFC1'><dt id='39EA73FFC1'><span id='39EA73FFC1'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='39EA73FFC1'></u>
          <i id='39EA73FFC1'><strike id='39EA73FFC1'><tt id='39EA73FFC1'><pre id='39EA73FFC1'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / Wikipedia / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:explore    Page View:4783
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In