<code id='39F425460A'></code><style id='39F425460A'></style>
    • <acronym id='39F425460A'></acronym>
      <center id='39F425460A'><center id='39F425460A'><tfoot id='39F425460A'></tfoot></center><abbr id='39F425460A'><dir id='39F425460A'><tfoot id='39F425460A'></tfoot><noframes id='39F425460A'>

    • <optgroup id='39F425460A'><strike id='39F425460A'><sup id='39F425460A'></sup></strike><code id='39F425460A'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='39F425460A'><label id='39F425460A'><select id='39F425460A'><dt id='39F425460A'><span id='39F425460A'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='39F425460A'></u>
          <i id='39F425460A'><strike id='39F425460A'><tt id='39F425460A'><pre id='39F425460A'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / explore / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:leisure time    Page View:92467
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In