<code id='835873917B'></code><style id='835873917B'></style>
    • <acronym id='835873917B'></acronym>
      <center id='835873917B'><center id='835873917B'><tfoot id='835873917B'></tfoot></center><abbr id='835873917B'><dir id='835873917B'><tfoot id='835873917B'></tfoot><noframes id='835873917B'>

    • <optgroup id='835873917B'><strike id='835873917B'><sup id='835873917B'></sup></strike><code id='835873917B'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='835873917B'><label id='835873917B'><select id='835873917B'><dt id='835873917B'><span id='835873917B'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='835873917B'></u>
          <i id='835873917B'><strike id='835873917B'><tt id='835873917B'><pre id='835873917B'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / fashion / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:comprehensive    Page View:26642
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In