<code id='1666B773AE'></code><style id='1666B773AE'></style>
    • <acronym id='1666B773AE'></acronym>
      <center id='1666B773AE'><center id='1666B773AE'><tfoot id='1666B773AE'></tfoot></center><abbr id='1666B773AE'><dir id='1666B773AE'><tfoot id='1666B773AE'></tfoot><noframes id='1666B773AE'>

    • <optgroup id='1666B773AE'><strike id='1666B773AE'><sup id='1666B773AE'></sup></strike><code id='1666B773AE'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='1666B773AE'><label id='1666B773AE'><select id='1666B773AE'><dt id='1666B773AE'><span id='1666B773AE'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='1666B773AE'></u>
          <i id='1666B773AE'><strike id='1666B773AE'><tt id='1666B773AE'><pre id='1666B773AE'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:comprehensive    Page View:3352
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In