<code id='D012415BF6'></code><style id='D012415BF6'></style>
    • <acronym id='D012415BF6'></acronym>
      <center id='D012415BF6'><center id='D012415BF6'><tfoot id='D012415BF6'></tfoot></center><abbr id='D012415BF6'><dir id='D012415BF6'><tfoot id='D012415BF6'></tfoot><noframes id='D012415BF6'>

    • <optgroup id='D012415BF6'><strike id='D012415BF6'><sup id='D012415BF6'></sup></strike><code id='D012415BF6'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='D012415BF6'><label id='D012415BF6'><select id='D012415BF6'><dt id='D012415BF6'><span id='D012415BF6'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='D012415BF6'></u>
          <i id='D012415BF6'><strike id='D012415BF6'><tt id='D012415BF6'><pre id='D012415BF6'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:comprehensive    Page View:355
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In