<code id='80E8750825'></code><style id='80E8750825'></style>
    • <acronym id='80E8750825'></acronym>
      <center id='80E8750825'><center id='80E8750825'><tfoot id='80E8750825'></tfoot></center><abbr id='80E8750825'><dir id='80E8750825'><tfoot id='80E8750825'></tfoot><noframes id='80E8750825'>

    • <optgroup id='80E8750825'><strike id='80E8750825'><sup id='80E8750825'></sup></strike><code id='80E8750825'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='80E8750825'><label id='80E8750825'><select id='80E8750825'><dt id='80E8750825'><span id='80E8750825'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='80E8750825'></u>
          <i id='80E8750825'><strike id='80E8750825'><tt id='80E8750825'><pre id='80E8750825'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:3
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In