<code id='18ED7D51DD'></code><style id='18ED7D51DD'></style>
    • <acronym id='18ED7D51DD'></acronym>
      <center id='18ED7D51DD'><center id='18ED7D51DD'><tfoot id='18ED7D51DD'></tfoot></center><abbr id='18ED7D51DD'><dir id='18ED7D51DD'><tfoot id='18ED7D51DD'></tfoot><noframes id='18ED7D51DD'>

    • <optgroup id='18ED7D51DD'><strike id='18ED7D51DD'><sup id='18ED7D51DD'></sup></strike><code id='18ED7D51DD'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='18ED7D51DD'><label id='18ED7D51DD'><select id='18ED7D51DD'><dt id='18ED7D51DD'><span id='18ED7D51DD'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='18ED7D51DD'></u>
          <i id='18ED7D51DD'><strike id='18ED7D51DD'><tt id='18ED7D51DD'><pre id='18ED7D51DD'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / explore

          explore


          explore

          author:focus    Page View:32143
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In