<code id='79B491D251'></code><style id='79B491D251'></style>
    • <acronym id='79B491D251'></acronym>
      <center id='79B491D251'><center id='79B491D251'><tfoot id='79B491D251'></tfoot></center><abbr id='79B491D251'><dir id='79B491D251'><tfoot id='79B491D251'></tfoot><noframes id='79B491D251'>

    • <optgroup id='79B491D251'><strike id='79B491D251'><sup id='79B491D251'></sup></strike><code id='79B491D251'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='79B491D251'><label id='79B491D251'><select id='79B491D251'><dt id='79B491D251'><span id='79B491D251'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='79B491D251'></u>
          <i id='79B491D251'><strike id='79B491D251'><tt id='79B491D251'><pre id='79B491D251'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:79
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In