<code id='1382E39A81'></code><style id='1382E39A81'></style>
    • <acronym id='1382E39A81'></acronym>
      <center id='1382E39A81'><center id='1382E39A81'><tfoot id='1382E39A81'></tfoot></center><abbr id='1382E39A81'><dir id='1382E39A81'><tfoot id='1382E39A81'></tfoot><noframes id='1382E39A81'>

    • <optgroup id='1382E39A81'><strike id='1382E39A81'><sup id='1382E39A81'></sup></strike><code id='1382E39A81'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='1382E39A81'><label id='1382E39A81'><select id='1382E39A81'><dt id='1382E39A81'><span id='1382E39A81'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='1382E39A81'></u>
          <i id='1382E39A81'><strike id='1382E39A81'><tt id='1382E39A81'><pre id='1382E39A81'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:fashion    Page View:69817
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In