<code id='5ABE14A827'></code><style id='5ABE14A827'></style>
    • <acronym id='5ABE14A827'></acronym>
      <center id='5ABE14A827'><center id='5ABE14A827'><tfoot id='5ABE14A827'></tfoot></center><abbr id='5ABE14A827'><dir id='5ABE14A827'><tfoot id='5ABE14A827'></tfoot><noframes id='5ABE14A827'>

    • <optgroup id='5ABE14A827'><strike id='5ABE14A827'><sup id='5ABE14A827'></sup></strike><code id='5ABE14A827'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='5ABE14A827'><label id='5ABE14A827'><select id='5ABE14A827'><dt id='5ABE14A827'><span id='5ABE14A827'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='5ABE14A827'></u>
          <i id='5ABE14A827'><strike id='5ABE14A827'><tt id='5ABE14A827'><pre id='5ABE14A827'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:explore    Page View:8
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In