<code id='7635B31119'></code><style id='7635B31119'></style>
    • <acronym id='7635B31119'></acronym>
      <center id='7635B31119'><center id='7635B31119'><tfoot id='7635B31119'></tfoot></center><abbr id='7635B31119'><dir id='7635B31119'><tfoot id='7635B31119'></tfoot><noframes id='7635B31119'>

    • <optgroup id='7635B31119'><strike id='7635B31119'><sup id='7635B31119'></sup></strike><code id='7635B31119'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='7635B31119'><label id='7635B31119'><select id='7635B31119'><dt id='7635B31119'><span id='7635B31119'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='7635B31119'></u>
          <i id='7635B31119'><strike id='7635B31119'><tt id='7635B31119'><pre id='7635B31119'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:explore    Page View:5791
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In