<code id='BAB7DC14CD'></code><style id='BAB7DC14CD'></style>
    • <acronym id='BAB7DC14CD'></acronym>
      <center id='BAB7DC14CD'><center id='BAB7DC14CD'><tfoot id='BAB7DC14CD'></tfoot></center><abbr id='BAB7DC14CD'><dir id='BAB7DC14CD'><tfoot id='BAB7DC14CD'></tfoot><noframes id='BAB7DC14CD'>

    • <optgroup id='BAB7DC14CD'><strike id='BAB7DC14CD'><sup id='BAB7DC14CD'></sup></strike><code id='BAB7DC14CD'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='BAB7DC14CD'><label id='BAB7DC14CD'><select id='BAB7DC14CD'><dt id='BAB7DC14CD'><span id='BAB7DC14CD'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='BAB7DC14CD'></u>
          <i id='BAB7DC14CD'><strike id='BAB7DC14CD'><tt id='BAB7DC14CD'><pre id='BAB7DC14CD'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / knowledge / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:explore    Page View:17432
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In