<code id='2AAA3FF348'></code><style id='2AAA3FF348'></style>
    • <acronym id='2AAA3FF348'></acronym>
      <center id='2AAA3FF348'><center id='2AAA3FF348'><tfoot id='2AAA3FF348'></tfoot></center><abbr id='2AAA3FF348'><dir id='2AAA3FF348'><tfoot id='2AAA3FF348'></tfoot><noframes id='2AAA3FF348'>

    • <optgroup id='2AAA3FF348'><strike id='2AAA3FF348'><sup id='2AAA3FF348'></sup></strike><code id='2AAA3FF348'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='2AAA3FF348'><label id='2AAA3FF348'><select id='2AAA3FF348'><dt id='2AAA3FF348'><span id='2AAA3FF348'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='2AAA3FF348'></u>
          <i id='2AAA3FF348'><strike id='2AAA3FF348'><tt id='2AAA3FF348'><pre id='2AAA3FF348'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:focus    Page View:22
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In