<code id='85881EEA86'></code><style id='85881EEA86'></style>
    • <acronym id='85881EEA86'></acronym>
      <center id='85881EEA86'><center id='85881EEA86'><tfoot id='85881EEA86'></tfoot></center><abbr id='85881EEA86'><dir id='85881EEA86'><tfoot id='85881EEA86'></tfoot><noframes id='85881EEA86'>

    • <optgroup id='85881EEA86'><strike id='85881EEA86'><sup id='85881EEA86'></sup></strike><code id='85881EEA86'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='85881EEA86'><label id='85881EEA86'><select id='85881EEA86'><dt id='85881EEA86'><span id='85881EEA86'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='85881EEA86'></u>
          <i id='85881EEA86'><strike id='85881EEA86'><tt id='85881EEA86'><pre id='85881EEA86'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:explore    Page View:99669
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In