<code id='030C3CFF97'></code><style id='030C3CFF97'></style>
    • <acronym id='030C3CFF97'></acronym>
      <center id='030C3CFF97'><center id='030C3CFF97'><tfoot id='030C3CFF97'></tfoot></center><abbr id='030C3CFF97'><dir id='030C3CFF97'><tfoot id='030C3CFF97'></tfoot><noframes id='030C3CFF97'>

    • <optgroup id='030C3CFF97'><strike id='030C3CFF97'><sup id='030C3CFF97'></sup></strike><code id='030C3CFF97'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='030C3CFF97'><label id='030C3CFF97'><select id='030C3CFF97'><dt id='030C3CFF97'><span id='030C3CFF97'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='030C3CFF97'></u>
          <i id='030C3CFF97'><strike id='030C3CFF97'><tt id='030C3CFF97'><pre id='030C3CFF97'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:comprehensive    Page View:7869
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In