<code id='7A4A949342'></code><style id='7A4A949342'></style>
    • <acronym id='7A4A949342'></acronym>
      <center id='7A4A949342'><center id='7A4A949342'><tfoot id='7A4A949342'></tfoot></center><abbr id='7A4A949342'><dir id='7A4A949342'><tfoot id='7A4A949342'></tfoot><noframes id='7A4A949342'>

    • <optgroup id='7A4A949342'><strike id='7A4A949342'><sup id='7A4A949342'></sup></strike><code id='7A4A949342'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='7A4A949342'><label id='7A4A949342'><select id='7A4A949342'><dt id='7A4A949342'><span id='7A4A949342'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='7A4A949342'></u>
          <i id='7A4A949342'><strike id='7A4A949342'><tt id='7A4A949342'><pre id='7A4A949342'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:hotspot    Page View:85741
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In