<code id='1687EE9874'></code><style id='1687EE9874'></style>
    • <acronym id='1687EE9874'></acronym>
      <center id='1687EE9874'><center id='1687EE9874'><tfoot id='1687EE9874'></tfoot></center><abbr id='1687EE9874'><dir id='1687EE9874'><tfoot id='1687EE9874'></tfoot><noframes id='1687EE9874'>

    • <optgroup id='1687EE9874'><strike id='1687EE9874'><sup id='1687EE9874'></sup></strike><code id='1687EE9874'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='1687EE9874'><label id='1687EE9874'><select id='1687EE9874'><dt id='1687EE9874'><span id='1687EE9874'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='1687EE9874'></u>
          <i id='1687EE9874'><strike id='1687EE9874'><tt id='1687EE9874'><pre id='1687EE9874'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:explore    Page View:982
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In