<code id='8FDE75F370'></code><style id='8FDE75F370'></style>
    • <acronym id='8FDE75F370'></acronym>
      <center id='8FDE75F370'><center id='8FDE75F370'><tfoot id='8FDE75F370'></tfoot></center><abbr id='8FDE75F370'><dir id='8FDE75F370'><tfoot id='8FDE75F370'></tfoot><noframes id='8FDE75F370'>

    • <optgroup id='8FDE75F370'><strike id='8FDE75F370'><sup id='8FDE75F370'></sup></strike><code id='8FDE75F370'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='8FDE75F370'><label id='8FDE75F370'><select id='8FDE75F370'><dt id='8FDE75F370'><span id='8FDE75F370'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='8FDE75F370'></u>
          <i id='8FDE75F370'><strike id='8FDE75F370'><tt id='8FDE75F370'><pre id='8FDE75F370'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:explore    Page View:15
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In