<code id='CD6E625086'></code><style id='CD6E625086'></style>
    • <acronym id='CD6E625086'></acronym>
      <center id='CD6E625086'><center id='CD6E625086'><tfoot id='CD6E625086'></tfoot></center><abbr id='CD6E625086'><dir id='CD6E625086'><tfoot id='CD6E625086'></tfoot><noframes id='CD6E625086'>

    • <optgroup id='CD6E625086'><strike id='CD6E625086'><sup id='CD6E625086'></sup></strike><code id='CD6E625086'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='CD6E625086'><label id='CD6E625086'><select id='CD6E625086'><dt id='CD6E625086'><span id='CD6E625086'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='CD6E625086'></u>
          <i id='CD6E625086'><strike id='CD6E625086'><tt id='CD6E625086'><pre id='CD6E625086'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:9978
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In