<code id='1EF6C103EF'></code><style id='1EF6C103EF'></style>
    • <acronym id='1EF6C103EF'></acronym>
      <center id='1EF6C103EF'><center id='1EF6C103EF'><tfoot id='1EF6C103EF'></tfoot></center><abbr id='1EF6C103EF'><dir id='1EF6C103EF'><tfoot id='1EF6C103EF'></tfoot><noframes id='1EF6C103EF'>

    • <optgroup id='1EF6C103EF'><strike id='1EF6C103EF'><sup id='1EF6C103EF'></sup></strike><code id='1EF6C103EF'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='1EF6C103EF'><label id='1EF6C103EF'><select id='1EF6C103EF'><dt id='1EF6C103EF'><span id='1EF6C103EF'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='1EF6C103EF'></u>
          <i id='1EF6C103EF'><strike id='1EF6C103EF'><tt id='1EF6C103EF'><pre id='1EF6C103EF'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:entertainment    Page View:81319
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In