<code id='284587CA28'></code><style id='284587CA28'></style>
    • <acronym id='284587CA28'></acronym>
      <center id='284587CA28'><center id='284587CA28'><tfoot id='284587CA28'></tfoot></center><abbr id='284587CA28'><dir id='284587CA28'><tfoot id='284587CA28'></tfoot><noframes id='284587CA28'>

    • <optgroup id='284587CA28'><strike id='284587CA28'><sup id='284587CA28'></sup></strike><code id='284587CA28'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='284587CA28'><label id='284587CA28'><select id='284587CA28'><dt id='284587CA28'><span id='284587CA28'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='284587CA28'></u>
          <i id='284587CA28'><strike id='284587CA28'><tt id='284587CA28'><pre id='284587CA28'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:knowledge    Page View:9
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In