<code id='1B635418FA'></code><style id='1B635418FA'></style>
    • <acronym id='1B635418FA'></acronym>
      <center id='1B635418FA'><center id='1B635418FA'><tfoot id='1B635418FA'></tfoot></center><abbr id='1B635418FA'><dir id='1B635418FA'><tfoot id='1B635418FA'></tfoot><noframes id='1B635418FA'>

    • <optgroup id='1B635418FA'><strike id='1B635418FA'><sup id='1B635418FA'></sup></strike><code id='1B635418FA'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='1B635418FA'><label id='1B635418FA'><select id='1B635418FA'><dt id='1B635418FA'><span id='1B635418FA'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='1B635418FA'></u>
          <i id='1B635418FA'><strike id='1B635418FA'><tt id='1B635418FA'><pre id='1B635418FA'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:hotspot    Page View:519
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In