<code id='56EA1AA254'></code><style id='56EA1AA254'></style>
    • <acronym id='56EA1AA254'></acronym>
      <center id='56EA1AA254'><center id='56EA1AA254'><tfoot id='56EA1AA254'></tfoot></center><abbr id='56EA1AA254'><dir id='56EA1AA254'><tfoot id='56EA1AA254'></tfoot><noframes id='56EA1AA254'>

    • <optgroup id='56EA1AA254'><strike id='56EA1AA254'><sup id='56EA1AA254'></sup></strike><code id='56EA1AA254'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='56EA1AA254'><label id='56EA1AA254'><select id='56EA1AA254'><dt id='56EA1AA254'><span id='56EA1AA254'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='56EA1AA254'></u>
          <i id='56EA1AA254'><strike id='56EA1AA254'><tt id='56EA1AA254'><pre id='56EA1AA254'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:hotspot    Page View:887
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In