<code id='BC176114D1'></code><style id='BC176114D1'></style>
    • <acronym id='BC176114D1'></acronym>
      <center id='BC176114D1'><center id='BC176114D1'><tfoot id='BC176114D1'></tfoot></center><abbr id='BC176114D1'><dir id='BC176114D1'><tfoot id='BC176114D1'></tfoot><noframes id='BC176114D1'>

    • <optgroup id='BC176114D1'><strike id='BC176114D1'><sup id='BC176114D1'></sup></strike><code id='BC176114D1'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='BC176114D1'><label id='BC176114D1'><select id='BC176114D1'><dt id='BC176114D1'><span id='BC176114D1'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='BC176114D1'></u>
          <i id='BC176114D1'><strike id='BC176114D1'><tt id='BC176114D1'><pre id='BC176114D1'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:focus    Page View:2
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In