<code id='52BC664D14'></code><style id='52BC664D14'></style>
    • <acronym id='52BC664D14'></acronym>
      <center id='52BC664D14'><center id='52BC664D14'><tfoot id='52BC664D14'></tfoot></center><abbr id='52BC664D14'><dir id='52BC664D14'><tfoot id='52BC664D14'></tfoot><noframes id='52BC664D14'>

    • <optgroup id='52BC664D14'><strike id='52BC664D14'><sup id='52BC664D14'></sup></strike><code id='52BC664D14'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='52BC664D14'><label id='52BC664D14'><select id='52BC664D14'><dt id='52BC664D14'><span id='52BC664D14'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='52BC664D14'></u>
          <i id='52BC664D14'><strike id='52BC664D14'><tt id='52BC664D14'><pre id='52BC664D14'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:leisure time    Page View:9
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In