<code id='2DAADADD6D'></code><style id='2DAADADD6D'></style>
    • <acronym id='2DAADADD6D'></acronym>
      <center id='2DAADADD6D'><center id='2DAADADD6D'><tfoot id='2DAADADD6D'></tfoot></center><abbr id='2DAADADD6D'><dir id='2DAADADD6D'><tfoot id='2DAADADD6D'></tfoot><noframes id='2DAADADD6D'>

    • <optgroup id='2DAADADD6D'><strike id='2DAADADD6D'><sup id='2DAADADD6D'></sup></strike><code id='2DAADADD6D'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='2DAADADD6D'><label id='2DAADADD6D'><select id='2DAADADD6D'><dt id='2DAADADD6D'><span id='2DAADADD6D'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='2DAADADD6D'></u>
          <i id='2DAADADD6D'><strike id='2DAADADD6D'><tt id='2DAADADD6D'><pre id='2DAADADD6D'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / explore / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:entertainment    Page View:5532
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In